|
S300V (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
The T-90, like the T-72 was designed with European terrain in mainly, not NAmerican or Middle-East. There are a lot of swampy areas and a lot of rivers. Imagine what a pontoon u have to build for a 70t tank like M1A2. Not to mention ground pressure or towing such a veheicle whenit gets boged down. That is why T-90 doesent exceed 50t.
DarthBerga (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
LOL!Check out the crow at 0.53 to 0.55 I can read beaks and he was barking orders at the wolf! He was telling the wolf "Pull you furry bastard!Get it by that burning tank and my shit better be medium rare or Im running this beak up your ass and pull out your intestines while you sleep tonight bitch"!!!
Kharmazov (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
At 2000 m.
MarshallJukov (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Low weight with same protection is advantage not disadvantage
Kharmazov (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Might be your right when it comes to the weight ,but the main reason of T-72 mass not exeding 50 tons remains.
MarshallJukov (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
МАЗ-7922 is not MAZ - 543
it is two different trucks
Kharmazov (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Then why an older truck MAZ - 543 weights empty 17 tons,when it has the same dimentions as the Topol-M one??
M829A2 penetration at 0 angle 680 RHA,A3 790 RHA.
MarshallJukov (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Nope
МАЗ-7922 clear weight without additional devices and ammunition is over 40 tonns
and M829A2 was "probably" penetrate T-72 from 500 m while M829A3 penetrate it from 500 with 70% probability (with 0 degree to armor)
and T-90 uses Relict armor not Kontak-5
T-90 used Kontakt 5 only until 1993 when it was T-72BU
Stop use wiki as your source
Kharmazov (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
And kontak-5 is still employed on T-90.Aditionally the M829A3 was an imidiate response,The new A3 is even more powerfull.
The 47,200 is mas of both the rocket and the carrier truck.
MarshallJukov (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
That response was to T-72B with only Kontakt-5 ERA |