sparkywundermutt1 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Its cool and stuff but it takes a long time and why cant you just park it yourself?

ojnica (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

music really sucks

lakai958 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

that is da fucking shit

oddvargv (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Who wants to pay?

chengtsu (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

right on, and remember, since humans are not allowed inside, "parking lot accidents" becomes history, and one more thing, i doubt the capacity is doubled, i would guess at least trippled, in fact, the bigger the capacity, the more you save, because so little area is destined to the function of passage way

chengtsu (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

i agree, but consider this, your choices are this slow parking lot (which is safe from sabotage, theft, accidental damage or scrathching by passerby or passing vehicle, etc.) or very limited chance of finding one on your own (because the parking space is so limited in the city, let's say like tokyo and hong kong) and even if you find the parking space, the vehicle is still exposed to the dangers i aforementioned, which would you rather?

miguellouro (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Boa pergunta ... realmente os arrumadores de carros tem infelizmente um bom emprego em vez de um util trabalho ! Esta nova tecnologia de estacionamento requer uma maior qualificação ao pessoal atendente destes serviços ... e Portugal pode evoluir.

granolasoos (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

e quem é que vai dar emprego aos arrumadores de carros?

jasonyeozhishen (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

that was good but really slow.

AG0525 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Meh, but why i speak anything before i see the pricelist :) Could be very interesting how much these systems cost (including special building techniques). Only then we could discuss about it. Maybe it is not that expensive. Or Maybe it is fit only in Japan cities, where they measure not in m^2, but rather in cm^2, becouse of the price of land.