Jack63815 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

it's been shown some small molecules and atoms preform is the same way.

Kartalizm1903 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

It's truly amazing. I'm fascinated.

ooObadboyOoo (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

LMFAO!

RichLOAguy (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

It is hard for many to grasp these ideas, and Bell certainly seems to understand what is happening in these experiments more than I. I have been trying to understand and will study Bells ideas, however 80% of quantum physicists believe in the coppenhagen interpretation. I am currently supporting the coppenhagen interpretation myself.

THEGREATMAX (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

What's this? AN interference pattern! My arch nemesis!!

ArjenDijksman (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Entanglement is another issue in QM, more subtle. But the subject of this video is interference, not entanglement. It's OK if a grandfather of quantum weirdness preaches quantum obscurantism. He has been educated with it. But we as grandchildren should focus on more rational approaches towards QM and question his interpretation with ordinary common sense. Interference patterns with single particles is not weird as said earlier.

RichLOAguy (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Bell test experiments to date overwhelmingly show that Bell inequalities are violated. These results provide empirical evidence against local realism and in favor of QM. The no-communication theorem proves that the observers cannot use the inequality violations to communicate information to each other faster than the speed of light.

ArjenDijksman (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

If you observe through which slit the particles went, you destroy the delicate phase-matching between the particle and its pilot-wave. In the same quote as below, John Bell ends with: This idea seems to me so natural and simple, to resolve the wave-particle dilemma in such a clear and ordinary way, that it is a great mystery to me that it was so generally ignored.

RichLOAguy (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

That does not explain the mystery of this experiment. The "act of observing" with "filters" gave different readings. How did the particles/photons react differently in the SAME experiment. There are many who believe this is the most important experiment of mankind.

RichLOAguy (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

The most commonly accepted interpretation is the coppenhagen interpretation (80%). This experiment is religion altering. lol It is a must see for all. Man has proven that matter depends on consciousness, yet very few understand or want to. This is a mind bender for sure