|
12GaugeMonster (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
The title says he's a Physicist. Plus, a Holographic computer image analyst. With a Masters Degree that's his name starts with Dr.; Not because he has a MD in medicine. And he is nalyzing images.... You are ignorant, this is a prime example of stupidity. Trying to mislabel the mans profession and background. He is the perfect guy to ask outside of NASA's employees like "mythbusters" ect; Watch their youtube videos, they'll crack you up. Then you see a lil more light to luminate your brain.
12GaugeMonster (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Russian KGB (russian version of the cia) knew in two hours of the first moon landing photos being publicly released that those photos were doctored. They didnt bother looking in on it, they went back to their gun mentality. Purpose of THE MOON LANDING was to make enough money to make a space program that can put nukes up in orbit. Why u think Kennedy mentioned it, IT WAS THE CLIMAX OF THE COLD WAR. Like the naval blockade of russian ships going to Cuba, again Kennedy was president. Think people.
astroroadshow (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Don't forget that this guy above is supposed to be an expert on Holograms. Holograms are not real pictures, just virtual ones made from models... so is his anlysis. Some would take it with a pinch of salt.. I would take it with an entire salt mine! NONE of the pics are fake - just this Groves guy trying to promote his business.
Brasker (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
well there are enough proves that make you think the hole thing wasn't as real as they said it was. For anyone who thinks about it for a second, it's highly probable some of the photos are fake, not taken in the moon, the same with the videos.
it wouldn't be the first time something of this magnitude is fake by the way...
inuk2600 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Hokay, the picture of the descent module with the shiny golden foil is an easy one. The exposure is set high enough that some areas of the lunar surface (reflectivity of 7%) is blown out. It is no surprise that the foil is reflecting so much from the dark side, as well as the white details. That white piece of equipment is lit so well because it is facing some golden foil on the hot side, not the camera side. I swear these scientists need to go back to school.
inuk2600 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
The disposition of the expert as he presents his findings is more snide than scientific. The complete data needed to extrapolate the exact terrain conditions etc... is just not possible from the 2D pictures. The astronauts themselves had trouble judging depth perception with their own eyes let alone a 2d picture. I'm sure the same goes for steepness of grade.
kev3d (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Well said. Since earth based radio telescopes could (and did) track the Apollo Missions, no one would have benefited more than the USSR to expose the "lie" if one had existed. After all is said and done, geology doesn't lie and the rock samples are extremely compelling. I personally think its amazingly cool that we, that is, Humans, actually have rocks from other world.
zellowmicka (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Lol :)
zellowmicka (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Lol
penguinx9 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
There is plenty of proof: photographs and films. What else do you need? Oh and planty of people making comments such as " we went ther. Live with it!" So you see of course it must be true. Anyway scientists would have scrutinised every image and questioned any anomolies! ooh I guess that's what they are doing. Hell! I would have loved to believe it. Too bad |
