|
theGoldenAgeOfBoredo (August 22, 2008 at 12:40 am)
really?well fuck it you get the point..
Bf2009 (August 22, 2008 at 12:39 am)
"bullpump"? Haha it's Bullpup.
theGoldenAgeOfBoredo (August 21, 2008 at 11:54 pm)
how come the us army isnt planing on bullpump weapons?its the future,no doubt.
look at the scar programme..all conventional.
and the bullpump brings along lots of good stuff..
legandarymasterrevan (August 21, 2008 at 6:20 pm)
wow, the way the bullet impacts some1 inside is undoubtedly quite violent! i would not want to get shot by 1 of those! tho the weapon still jams bcus of all the fillings i'm guessing
Bf2009 (August 21, 2008 at 4:06 pm)
Who the Hell fires fully-automatic at 450 meters? Double taps are far more accurate than bursts. I still prefer the M14, or anything in 7.62x51mm NATO over the M16 any day.
ilovecats748 (August 21, 2008 at 2:12 am)
the guys like "an average soldier would waste all his bullets on one enemy in full automatic" (something like that), hey i got a revolutionary solution for that! ITS CALLED SEMI AUTOMATIC!!!
bladerrunner422 (August 21, 2008 at 12:43 am)
true and the best thing is you could cut down a forest with any of them
CowboyWolf (August 20, 2008 at 2:01 am)
no. its not. the M1 is a 30.06, m14 is a 308. piston is different, and its magazine is a completly different system. thats like comparing a G3 to a FAL.
xiaoxiao29 (August 18, 2008 at 8:04 pm)
yea but also makes it a lot heavier.
angrycaveman (August 18, 2008 at 3:00 pm)
yeah thats the way it works man! thats the stuff.. |
