|
cheesemonkey421 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
It's one thing to try and go after paris hilton who is spoiled and famous for being famous. But for the famous people/celebrities who are perfectly fine (like Jimmy Kimmel) who should be recognized for whatever they are famous for, but should be granted privacy from these creepy tabloids and websites.
"Aren't they kind of protected by piles of money from those rocks?" asked Gould. She makes it sounds like if you have money you are happy. Your dignity and private life will still be hurt!
Hieronymus76 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Just another talking inflatable doll.
hijodesu45 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
"...but nothing has happened yet.." wow! Maybe a web site tracking this woman's movements and posting them for the world to see would help her see things slightly different. I wonder what John Lennon thinks about this "fun" website and the people that support it. :(
jmilfker (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
she has more money than you too, doesn't she.
yes. she's an entrepreneur.
Richieygrl (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
She's sleazy and profits from harming others.
Archantis (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
its a stupid idea.
rockfictionaire (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Wow, Jimmy pretty much owned her. I like how he just picked her apart, and proved how evil her "job" is. I give her credit for defending herself really well, but she needs a better job than stalking celebrities.
brittanyanddomenico (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I like her. I think she handled herself well.
Rcksaltnnails (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
She is a leach, get a real job and leave people alone you creepy ass! And whats with the stuff scrolling at the bottom of the screen?
misterx70 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
she looks hot because the video is obviously not clear and blurry. |
